Intelligent, courageous leadership
The Chinese comprise only 30 per cent of 
Malaysian voters, yet Pakatan Rakyat won 51 per cent of the total votes 
cast. By saying that the election result was because of the Chinese 
voters, the Barisan Nasional leadership demonstrates an inability to 
objectively face reality.
Barisan’s acceptance of Zulkifli Nordin 
as its direct Shah Alam candidate similarly shows a lack of intelligence
 and courage. Here is a lawyer who does not feel that dialogue and 
discussion can resolve matters, having forcefully disrupted a Law 
Society seminar a few years ago. He has vowed loyalty to, and then 
turned on, his previous political parties (PAS and PKR). He has publicly
 belittled an ancient religion with a million Malaysian followers.
UMNO making way for Ibrahim Ali to 
contest the Pasir Mas constituency is similarly bad judgement, showing 
its acceptance and approval of a crude man who prides himself with using
 vulgar words in public interviews.
Principled means acting in accordance with morality and showing recognition of right and wrong.
To give them such special honour and 
credit shows a lack of intelligent reasoning and an inability to stand 
up against the loud extremist faction of the party.
Attributing the election outcome to a 
“Chinese tsunami” is illogical in the face of concrete facts and data. 
PAS won an additional seven state seats in Selangor, all in Malay 
majority areas.
Lim Kit Siang could not have achieved a 
majority of over 14,000 votes in Gelang Patah without good support from 
Malays who form 35 per cent of the electorate there.
Similarly the UMNO-backed PERKASA 
extremists were conclusively rejected in Pasir Mas (96 per cent Malay) 
and in Shah Alam where Malays make up 70 per cent of the electorate.
To blindly spin the 2013 election outcome
 to suit its raced-based founding philosophy of 1947shows up a political
 party that wants to be stubbornly unwise. Unless UMNO’s leadership can 
find the courage to face facts, the party may become redundant and 
obsolete for the educated 21st century voter.
Academic studies have consistently shown 
that increased income brings more happiness and satisfaction only up to a
 certain point. When a society progresses out of poverty into middle 
class, increasing income does not increase satisfaction proportionately.
 It is the psychological aspects of living that produces a better 
quality of life.
Whatever the radiation scientists claim, 
the people of Bentong (45 per cent Malay, 44 per cent Chinese) will ask 
why a factory run by an Australian company is unsuitable for Australia 
or Damansara Heights but can be located in their backyard.
In 2008, Health Minister Liow won Bentong
 by over 12,000 votes. This year he retained Bentong with less than 400 
votes against a political novice who is a green activist. The urban 
electorate, Chinese or Malay, seeks respect and recognition of their 
right to a safe living environment.
MCA contested in 37 parliamentary seats and managed to win seven in GE13.
In Penang, the 1 Malaysia Charity 
organisation hosted numerous concerts and dinners in support of Barisan 
candidates. At their functions, T-shirts, beer, hawker food and lucky 
draw gifts were given free.
Initially there was merriment and wonder 
at this new campaigning style; this then became anger and disgust when 
even cash incentives were handed out. The electorate felt they were 
treated with disrespect, as if their rights, dignity and vote were up 
for sale.
Numerous development issues had plagued 
the Penang DAP government in the months leading up to the election, and 
the increased majority they subsequently obtained can only be explained 
by the strong rejection what the other side represents. Money cannot buy
 happiness, and similarly, the urban electorate set out to show that 
money cannot buy their vote in Penang.
The urban electorate in Malaysia is 
obviously better off economically compared to the rural dwellers. They 
have reached a stage when extra economic incentives can no longer easily
 win their approval.
Instead they asked for respect, and an 
acknowledgement of their right to an inclusive, peaceful existence in 
the country. They seek recognition as a legitimate electorate with the 
right to choose the governing party. Blaming and insulting them for 
voting against the Barisan will only guarantee the DAP and Pakatan a 
brighter future.
There is no doubt that relative to those 
who were once our equivalent, we Malaysians have fallen behind. The 
Singapore dollar which was equivalent to the ringgit in the 1970’s is 
today 2.5 times higher. Malaysia beat South Korea and Japan in the 1972 
Olympic football qualifying rounds; today we are nowhere near these 2 
World Cup Finals participating countries.
Universiti Malaya had topped the list of 
universities passing the United States medical qualifying examination in
 1969, ahead of Melbourne and Singapore University. In 2011, Universiti 
Malaya was ranked 401 out of the 500 universities in the Shanghai Jiao 
Tong University’s Academic Ranking of World Universities.
The educated, smart-phone holding, 
internet-surfing, urban voter is aware of world-wide trends and wants to
 experience the best that life can offer. When the governing party is 
unable to develop the country to its full potential, its popularity will
 drop.
As demonstrated by the Noble prize 
winning Dr Ivan Pavlov, animals respond to incentives, and man is no 
exception. A system that promotes those who agree with and pamper those 
in power while sidelining those working hard to pursue competency will 
breed inefficient malfunctioning institutions. Even those not under 
their direct employment will be affected by these incompetent 
institutions.

Malaysians want a competent and efficient institutions.
Conclusion
by Ong Hean Teik
Malaysians want a competent and efficient institutions.
When the police force is politicised and 
crime rate increases, more money will have to be spent on personal and 
household security. Even Datuk Nazir Razak admitted that he had 
hesitated coming back to Malaysia because of concerns about his 
children’s education. When the middle class spends on private education 
or healthcare, votes for the governing party will drop.
The Chinese now make up only 25 per cent 
of Malaysia’s population and to be named as the cause of major 
developments in the country is to be hurtful to this minority and 
insulting to the majority. On the other hand, government statistics show
 that Malaysia’s urban population has increased from 62 per cent in 2000
 to 71 per cent in 2010.
 No amount of rhetorical whitewashing can 
hide the fact that the poor performance of Barisan in the 2013 election 
is due to its failure to win the heart and mind of the urban voter. The 
faster it faces reality and move away from its obsolete race-based 
mindset, the better its prospects for the next electoral battle.
* Dr Ong Hean Teik is a consultant cardiologist in Penang. He reads The Malaysian Insider. 
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.
Related posts:
 


 
 
