President Sarkunan Subramaniam said the bias towards valuers had to stop if property management is to progress in today’s fast-changing digital and technology capabilities.
“I urge the Board of Valuers, Appraisers, Estate Agents and Property Managers to reconsider its decision and listen to the professional bodies.
“Giving a property management licence to one who has no or little experience in property management is dangerous,” he said.
Sarkunan was speaking at the MIPFM Conference 2018 on Bridging Property Management and Facility Management.
He said the current real estate degrees are skewed towards valuation subjects. Those who trained in predominantly valuation-based companies have little to no experience in managing properties.
Government valuers, having passed valuers test, are automatically handed the property management licence.
Sarkuanna, himself a valuer, is calling for objectivity. He said the diverse range of office buildings, mixed integrated projects and stratified residential projects must be matched with parallel top grade maintenance. Or their value may suffer.
“I will get a lot of opposition for my views but this is for the good of the real estate sector,” he said.
Sarkunan also highlighted the rife corruption in this field. “Corruption in procurement, kickbacks and side money is so prevalent that it has rusted performance, bringing many buildings to a grinding halt,” he said.
Sarkunan related the tale of two office blocks in Bangsar where seven out of its nine management committee (MC) members have resigned, the chairman among them.
Those who resigned were from Tower A, which the developer had earlier sold to private individual owners. Tower B belonged to the developer who had put the building under a real estate investment trust.
There was a cash surplus in the accounts. It seems that during the period when the developer was managing the property, the developer apportioned all surplus monies collected to the tower they retained. When the MC took over, it faced a defiant developer.
The Commissioner of Buildings has directed an extraordinary general meeting to be held.
In another case, a developer refused to pave the way for a joint management body (JMB) to be formed because it wanted to control the money collected, Sarkunan said. COB stepped in to resolve the issue.
Transparency International Malaysia president Datuk Seri Akhbar Satar said fraud and corruption is common due to the variety of goods and services involved.
Satar said that in 2010, Palm Court Condominium residents alleged that about RM144,000 was misappropriated. The committee agreed to take “appropriate measures” but refused an independent audit.
On Jan 31, 2017, members of a JMB were arrested by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission for allegedly misappropriating RM1.5mil.
Satar said cases like these highlighted the need for a culture of integrity and transparency.
- The Star by Thean Lee Cheng
Related posts:
STRATA Property insights - Serious on strata
High-rise living in below par, need professionalism in managing the property
A strata property living nightmare: leakage
The party responsible is not your upstairs neighbour but the management
Malaysian Strata Management Act 2013 will be enforced from June 1, 2015 in Penang
By-laws governing strata property management in Malaysia, part 1
Third Schedule of Strata Management Regulation 2015
By-laws governing strata property management in Malaysia, part 2
By-laws governing strata property in Malaysia, part 3
General prohibitions of a proprietor according to the Third Schedule of Strata Management Regulation 2015
Service charges under strata title property in Malaysia
No comments:
Post a Comment